|
Post by Peter on Apr 23, 2020 7:53:33 GMT
Roman Christianity to Britain in 597 AD. William Pitt, 2018
We cannot accurately record the history of Christianity in Britain, unless we include the falsification of Christianity by Rome. The information on Augustine, below, is directly from the Encyclopedia Brittanica. It states that when Augustine arrived in Britain, it was largely Pagan. This puzzled me for a few minutes, until I could see that Augustine landed on the Isle of Thanet, which is in the Thames estuary. In 597AD, this would have been in Saxon occupied territory, and of course, Pagan. There would have been little contact with British Christianity, which started in Britain, 560 years earlier. So Pope Gregory sent Augustine to bring Roman Christianity to the Anglo-Saxons, before they could be converted to British Christianity. Gregory would have been well aware, that the oldest college in the United Kingdom, Cor Tewdws, Llantwit Major, was founded c. 395 AD in honour of the Roman Emperor Theodosius I. It was refounded by St. Illud, in 508 AD, from whom it derives its present name. This was still 90 years before Augustine's arrival. So what was the motive? Theodosius I had declared Cor Tewdws to be Nicene Christianity
Encyclopedia Brittanica
Augustine of Canterbury, also called Austin, (born Rome?—died May 26, 604/605, Canterbury, Kent, England; feast day in England and Wales May 26, elsewhere May 28), first archbishop of Canterbury and the apostle to England, who founded the Christian church in southern England. Probably of aristocratic birth, Augustine was prior of the Benedictine monastery of St. Andrew, Rome, when Pope St. Gregory I the Great chose him to lead an unprecedented mission of about 40 monks to England, which was then largely pagan. They left in June 596, but, arriving in southern Gaul, they were warned of the perils awaiting them and sent Augustine back to Rome. There Gregory encouraged him with letters of commendation (dated July 23, 596), and he set out once more. The entourage landed in the spring of 597 on the Isle of Thanet, off the southeast coast of England, and was well received by King Aethelberht (Ethelbert) I of Kent, who gave the missionaries a dwelling place in Canterbury and the old St. Martin’s Church, where he allowed them to preach. With Aethelberht’s support, their work led to many conversions, including that of the King. In the following autumn Augustine was consecrated bishop of the English by St. Virgilius at Arles. Thousands of Aethelberht’s subjects were reportedly baptized by Augustine on Christmas Day 597, and he subsequently dispatched two of his monks to Rome with a report of this extraordinary event and a request for further help and advice. They returned in 601 with the pallium (i.e., symbol of metropolitan jurisdiction) from Gregory for Augustine and with more missionaries, including the celebrated saints Mellitus, Justus, and Paulinus. Gregory, with whom Augustine corresponded throughout his apostolate, directed him to purify pagan temples for Christian worship and to consecrate 12 suffragan bishops; thus, he was given authority over the bishops in Britain, and the evangelization of the Kingdom of Kent began. Augustine founded Christ Church, Canterbury, as his cathedral and the monastery of St. Peter and Paul (known after his death as St. Augustine’s, where the early archbishops were buried), which came to rank as the second Benedictine house in all Europe. Canterbury thus was established as the primatial see of England, a position maintained thereafter. In 604 he established the episcopal sees of London (for the East Saxons), consecrating Mellitus as its bishop, and of Rochester, consecrating Justus as its bishop. At a conference with British bishops, Augustine tried in vain to unify the British (Celtic) churches of North Wales and the churches he was founding. A second conference, his last recorded act, proved equally fruitless. Augustine was buried at St. Peter and Paul.
|
|
|
Post by Margaret on Apr 28, 2020 8:56:45 GMT
The Kingdom (Kent) which Augustine successfully converted to Roman Christianity was a very small one in comparison to the whole of Britain but we are never taught the actual facts. The grey areas on this map were already Christian - as taught by Joseph of Arimathea. <script id="th-iframe-script" src="chrome-extension://ofdopmlmgifpfkijadehmhjccbefaeec/assets/comms/commsiframe.js"></script>
|
|
|
Post by Peter on Apr 29, 2020 10:45:01 GMT
That is an interesting map, Margaret. What is the source? I have saved the map to my collection of maps, that will assist in assessing the spread of the colonies in Britain. I have found several maps with similar but different content. It is not a question of who is right, but what is correct. We see the same issue with maps of Roman Britain. I will be writing an article showing the spread of the foreign colonies, when I have collected enough verifiable maps. We know that we cannot trust "English" maps.
We can see the difference between the Roman era, and the post-Roman era. After the Romans departed, there appears to be some degree of push-back by the British, to contain the spread of the foreign settlers.
Note that Brittany is still part of Britain. That has always been a pet peeve of mine. The British were overwhelmed by foreign settlers. They never surrendered or relinquished title to any land. The wedding gift of Brittany, as a dowry, became a part of France in 1532, when Anne, heir to Brittany, married two successive kings of France, Charles VIII and Louis XII. In the formal treaty of incorporation into France in 1532, the province was guaranteed local privileges. As Anne was not the legal owner of Brittany, that gift was not valid. That would be as invalid, as the mayor of Caernarfon giving Anglesey as a wedding gift to his son in law.
Anyway, the spread of illegal immigrants into Britain, depends on whose map we are looking at. We cannot even rely on archaeology being correct. Suttoin Hoo, and British roads being declared Roman are good examples.
As you quite rightly point out, we were never taught correct history, and even today, there is a lot of resistance when we try to spread awareness of the truth.
|
|
|
Post by Margaret on Apr 29, 2020 16:54:45 GMT
The one I posted comes from William R. Shepherd, "The Historical Atlas" (1926 edition). I too have several different maps which do not always agree with each other but tend to have one thing in common - that the England we know today was never entirely "Anglicised". There was really never any period of British history when we became "Anglo-Saxon", a term which makes no sense. There were Angles and there were Saxons. There were also large areas which remained British (Welsh) which makes a mockery of what we are taught as English History.
|
|