Post by Margaret on Jul 10, 2019 22:34:08 GMT
The Coelbren Alphabet is alleged to have been an invention of Iolo Morganwg, some kind of fabricated runic alphabet which he called Coelbren y Beirdd ("the Bardic Alphabet").
He claimed that it was the alphabetic system of the ancient druids and that he had discovered it, not created it.
And yet he has been defamed as a forger and fraud and this discovery of his has been ignored by academics and ridiculed by historians.
This attitude sadly renders many valuable inscriptions in Britain, Spain, Switzerland, Italy, the Aegean, Turkey, Assyria, and elsewhere, including Palestine and Egypt, indecipherable.
However:
Julius Caesar described this ancient British Alphabet circa 55BC
•
Ammianus Marcellinus also described the British Alphabet and actually stated that the Greeks got their Alphabet from the British.
•
An Alphabet is identically described, and matching British records, in the Nag Hamadi documents of the Gnostic church that were buried before AD 400 and discovered in 1945.
•
Large numbers of Khumric mediaeval poets mentioned and described the ancient British Alphabet, starting with Daffydd ap Gwilym who died 1367.
•
Rhys Goch of Oswestry wrote a poem lampooning this Coelbren Alphabet in 1582.
•
A collection of documents in fourteen leather satchels in a five foot high clay jar was buried around AD 400 and rediscovered in 1945.
It contains a description of the Alphabet allegedly forged by Edward Williams (Iolo Morganwg) around 1800.
Therefore allegations that this ancient, British Alphabet is a fake and that it was forged by a man who was not born until 1747 are ludicrous.
Hebrew scroll shows Coelbren similarities, though more cursive.
Generally speaking, an inscribed stone would not be cursive due to the difficulty of carving.
He claimed that it was the alphabetic system of the ancient druids and that he had discovered it, not created it.
And yet he has been defamed as a forger and fraud and this discovery of his has been ignored by academics and ridiculed by historians.
This attitude sadly renders many valuable inscriptions in Britain, Spain, Switzerland, Italy, the Aegean, Turkey, Assyria, and elsewhere, including Palestine and Egypt, indecipherable.
However:
Julius Caesar described this ancient British Alphabet circa 55BC
•
Ammianus Marcellinus also described the British Alphabet and actually stated that the Greeks got their Alphabet from the British.
•
An Alphabet is identically described, and matching British records, in the Nag Hamadi documents of the Gnostic church that were buried before AD 400 and discovered in 1945.
•
Large numbers of Khumric mediaeval poets mentioned and described the ancient British Alphabet, starting with Daffydd ap Gwilym who died 1367.
•
Rhys Goch of Oswestry wrote a poem lampooning this Coelbren Alphabet in 1582.
•
A collection of documents in fourteen leather satchels in a five foot high clay jar was buried around AD 400 and rediscovered in 1945.
It contains a description of the Alphabet allegedly forged by Edward Williams (Iolo Morganwg) around 1800.
Therefore allegations that this ancient, British Alphabet is a fake and that it was forged by a man who was not born until 1747 are ludicrous.
Hebrew scroll shows Coelbren similarities, though more cursive.
Generally speaking, an inscribed stone would not be cursive due to the difficulty of carving.